As I was reading out of "Good to Great" by Jim Collins, I came across the Hedgehog principle and it reminded me of a work experience I had last February.
Collins says that great companies fall in the intersection of 3 circles:
1) What are you passionate about?
2) What can you be the best in the world at?
3) What drives your economic engine
I was working as an intern for a small business consulting firm. We had a project that allowed me to do things for the company that were both very creative and very analytic/numbers driven. I soon came to realize that I didn't enjoy the data compiling and analyzing nearly as much as I liked getting to be creative through marketing and developing business strategies for the company. I realized that for my career, I wanted to be able to use my creative side at least every now and then in my job.
I have also realized that I much more a "big picture", "visionary", "or idea-maker" type of person. I have realized that may be the greatest skill that I have and is probably the thing I can truly be best at.
Lastly, I began taking classes in entrepreneurship. This is a way that I can take my creativity and ideas and build real economic value. I have recently begun building my own company and loving the direction my career has taken.
Now that I have applied the Hedgehog model to myself, I can apply it to my start-up as well. I am passionate about what we are doing. The idea is a blue-ocean idea and so we can be the best at it because no one else is doing what we are doing. As I have thought about our economic engine, we should probably take a "per customer" approach because we will be selling a physical product and we can likely augment our core product with complimentary products that are cheap for us and high margin, in order to gain more profit per customer.
Overall, Jim Collins' Hedgehog Model is an interesting model that can be used to describe both success in find a career that works for you and in building a great company!
Friday, January 27, 2012
Friday, January 20, 2012
Kodak's bankruptcy explained by Porter's Five Forces
The following article show a great example of the how the Market forces outlined in the Porter's Five Forces Model can push a company of the playing field:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/kodak-bankruptcy-dims-once-bright-025841813.html
Here's my analysis of the article:
Kodak was once a strong and thriving business. As of this week, it has filed for bankruptcy! So, how did this happen? Well, if we take the situation and explain the events leading up to Kodak's demise with the Five Forces Model, we can understand how an industry giant can be brought to it's knees by a rapidly changing market.
As the article states, Kodak invented the handheld camera. In other words, they created the Market for handheld photography. Kodak remained the market leader until the late 1990's, when digital technology became a legitimate Threat as a Substitute Product. Since Kodak acts a supplier to motion picture studios and other photographers, they began to lose bargaining power as a supplier because their customers had more options to suit their needs and gradually became less dependent on film.
Chris McGurk said, "Kodak failed to recognize the game-changing impact the digital technology would have on the film-making business. Those who didn't see it have fallen by the wayside.
The industry began to change and there began to be great competition within the industry, from companies with superior technology, like Canon and Olympus. Along with an increase in competition and new entrants came an increase in the bargaining power of consumers. Consumers had more choices, better products, and lower prices thank to this competition. The competitors who got on board with digital technology and led the market were able to push Kodak out of the market as industry leader and take over the market. Essentially, everyone won except for Kodak because they failed to implement an effective strategy for a changing market.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/kodak-bankruptcy-dims-once-bright-025841813.html
Here's my analysis of the article:
Kodak was once a strong and thriving business. As of this week, it has filed for bankruptcy! So, how did this happen? Well, if we take the situation and explain the events leading up to Kodak's demise with the Five Forces Model, we can understand how an industry giant can be brought to it's knees by a rapidly changing market.
As the article states, Kodak invented the handheld camera. In other words, they created the Market for handheld photography. Kodak remained the market leader until the late 1990's, when digital technology became a legitimate Threat as a Substitute Product. Since Kodak acts a supplier to motion picture studios and other photographers, they began to lose bargaining power as a supplier because their customers had more options to suit their needs and gradually became less dependent on film.
Chris McGurk said, "Kodak failed to recognize the game-changing impact the digital technology would have on the film-making business. Those who didn't see it have fallen by the wayside.
The industry began to change and there began to be great competition within the industry, from companies with superior technology, like Canon and Olympus. Along with an increase in competition and new entrants came an increase in the bargaining power of consumers. Consumers had more choices, better products, and lower prices thank to this competition. The competitors who got on board with digital technology and led the market were able to push Kodak out of the market as industry leader and take over the market. Essentially, everyone won except for Kodak because they failed to implement an effective strategy for a changing market.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)